In a written reply to participants of the planned protest on buses a deputy commander of the peacekeeping force reportedly said that the terms of the deployment of the Russian military under a trilateral statement signed by the leaders of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan in November 2020 to end a six-week war in Nagorno-Karabakh did not provide for the possibility of escorting protests on wheels and ensuring the security of various demonstrations and rallies.
“Peacekeepers are there to check for prohibited items, in particular, firearms and explosives, among participants of traffic at checkpoints,” Russian officer Sazonov, who introduced himself only by his surname, wrote, as quoted by Artur Osipian, a Karabakh activist engaged in the local movement against the Azerbaijani blockade.
The Russian representative also reportedly dismissed claims being disseminated on social media in Azerbaijan that Russian troops intended to use force against Azerbaijani officers at the checkpoint of the Hakari bridge on the pretext of providing the security for a peaceful Karabakh Armenian protest. Sazonov, as presented by Osipian, stressed that peaceful protests were not grounds for holding any military operation by the Russian peacekeeping force.
Having a written reply from Alexander Lentsov, the commander of the Russian peacekeeping forces, was the demand of members of the movement for unblocking the Lachin corridor that they presented to the command of the Russian contingent in Nagorno-Karabakh last Friday.
Participants of the movement say that the intended goal of their action is “to show to the world that [Azerbaijani President Ilham] Aliyev is lying when he says that the road is open.”
It is unclear yet whether members of the movement will attempt their announced protest on dozens of buses towards the Azerbaijani checkpoints in the coming days, but activist Osipian said that they remained adamant despite the reply of the Russian peacekeeping force command that he described as preposterous.
“Now let the Russians explain how providing the security of a dozen or a hundred civilian vehicles is different from providing the security of one civilian vehicle,” Osipian said in a Facebook video.
The activist claimed that with this latest development “the Kremlin has revealed its true face, showing that the Russians are together with Azerbaijan.”
“We have great suspicions now that along with Azerbaijan it is the Russian peacekeepers, or should I say occupation troops, which they are, who subject us to a blockade… We do not lose heart, we will continue our struggle,” Osipian said.
Amid severe shortages of food, medicines, fuel and other basic products brought on by the Azerbaijani blockade Nagorno-Karabakh’s ethnic Armenian authorities stressed last week that while they were not part of the civil initiative and did not provide it with logistics, they treated with understanding the demands of the movement.
Meanwhile, at least one opposition member of the region’s parliament, Metakse Hakobian, claimed last week that the “theatrical” initiative was being guided by authorities in Stepanakert and Yerevan to discredit the Russian peacekeepers.
Russian peacekeepers deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh as part of the 2020 ceasefire agreement have increasingly been criticized in Stepanakert and Yerevan for their inability to act in accordance with their mission stated in the document, that is, to protect the security of the local population.
They are also blamed for effectively ceding control of the Lachin corridor, the only road connecting Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia, to Azerbaijan earlier this year amid a perceived weakening of Russia’s political and military positions in the region due to its largely failing invasion of Ukraine.
Echoing this widely held belief, Nagorno-Karabakh’s ethnic Armenian leader Arayik Harutiunian acknowledged on Sunday that Russia’s inability to implement “the most important provision [of the ceasefire agreement] concerning the Lachin corridor” is “a consequence of the Russo-Ukrainian war.”